|
|
HOW TO HAMMER A SHIRT APART (AND TALK ABOUT IT): UNUSUAL INSTRUMENT THEME
CONFIGURATIONS AND COMPLEX PREDICATES ACROSS LANGUAGES
Juergen Bohnemeyer
University of Buffalo-SUNY
with Nick Enfield (Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics), James Essegbey (University of Florida at
Gainesville), Asifa Majid (Max Planck Institute for Psycholinguistics), and Miriam van Staden (Universiteit van
Amsterdam)
Saturday, January 20, 10:45 AM MJH Rm 126
We examine the treatment of atypical instrument-theme configurations in events of caused separation in material integrity
(Hale & Keyser 1987) – i.e., “cutting” and “breaking” (C&B) events - across languages. We focus on four languages which offer
an alternative between monomorphemic verb roots and various kinds of complex predicates in the C&B domain: serial verb
constructions in Lao and Sranan, compound verb stems in Yucatec Maya, and prefix verbs, particle verbs, resultative
constructions, and light verb constructions in German. We test the hypothesis that in accordance with Grice’s (1989) Manner
maxims, across languages, complex predicates are preferred over simplex predicates for reference to atypical instrument-theme
configurations. We draw on descriptions of the “Cut and Break Clips” (Bohnemeyer, Bowerman, & Brown 2001) from five speakers
per language. We treat the typicality of a scene as the degree to which it matches the prototype of any linguistic
description, and rely primarily on inter-speaker variation as a measure of (a-)typicality in this sense. In line with our
hypothesis, we found that the higher the amount of inter-speaker variation a scene elicited in a given language, the more
likely the speakers of that language were to prefer complex over simplex predicates. However, though highly significant for
the other three languages, this correlation is not significant for German. In German, simplex verbs play no more than a
marginal role in the C&B domain; we argue that this upsets the division of labor between simplex and complex expressions
underlying the relation between Gricean stereotype and manner implicatures.
|
|