UNINTERPRETED FEATURES ON BOUND VARIABLE PRONOUNS

Irene Heim (MIT)

Friday, February 25, 3:30 pm, MJH Rm 126

Are person, number and gender features on bound-variable pronouns semantically interpreted, or are they just a superficial reflex of agreement between the pronoun and its antecedent? Some (e.g., Heim 1991, Kratzer 1998, Stechow 2003) argue that at least some pronouns have the semantics of featureless, unrestricted, variables. Others (e.g., Cooper 1983, Schlenker 2003, Rullmann 2004) derive good predictions from the assumption that features on bound pronouns restrict the range of the relevant variable. It has also been noted (Rullmann, Safir 2005) that simple deletion or copying rules such as those proposed in the literature do not really succeed in predicting the distribution of features on bound pronouns. I will review and defend the case for uninterpreted features and try to provide a more accurate account of their distribution.











this site is loved by philip hofmeister and he is loved back